<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Not Genuises: avoids</title> 
    <link>http://www.notgeniuses.com/</link> 
    <description>Recent bookmarks posted to Not Genuises</description>
    <ttl>60</ttl>

    <item>
        <title>Microsoft Security Essentials Finds Brand-New Malware But Avoids False Positives</title>
        <link>http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2010/06/microsoft-security-essentials-finds-brand-new-malware-but-avoids-false-positives-still-the-best-free-option/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LifehackerAustralia+%28Lifehacker+Australia%29</link>
        <description>Microsoft's free Security Essentials package rates well at removing malware and running light, but what about dealing with brand-new, unidentified bad...</description>
        <dc:creator>iannnec19</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:48:40 +0000</pubDate>

            <category>australia</category>
            <category>avoids</category>
            <category>best</category>
            <category>brand</category>
            <category>essentials</category>
            <category>false</category>
            <category>finds</category>
            <category>free</category>
            <category>lifehacker</category>
            <category>malware</category>
            <category>microsoft</category>
            <category>option</category>
            <category>positives</category>
            <category>security</category>
            <category>still</category>
    
    </item>

</channel>
</rss>
