« Clark's Problems -- or Not? | Main | Choice »

September 26, 2003

What Charity?

Posted by Ezra Klein

This is why the Republican view towards giving doesn't work. It's not the fault of the ideology, but of the Republicans (and Democrats, etc):

The Chronicle of Philanthropy reports that Americans making $70,000 or more dispensed a paltry 3.3 percent of their earnings to charitable cuases; in contrast, those making $50,000 to $69,999 gave 5.6 percent, and those making $30,000 to $49,999 gave 8.9 percent. Only at death does the tightfistedness diminish—but even then it's the threat of the estate tax that awakens the philanthropic spirit. Or at least that's the conclusion of another new study, which predicts that deathbed donations will drop precipitously if the Bush Administration succeeds rolling back the estate tax. The study finds that the cost of such a repeal, in lost donations and bequests, could be as steep as $10 billion a year.
I'm all for taking charity out of the Government's hands, but the truth is that those thousand points of light simply don't burn very brightly. So when we couple the effects of Republicans in office (less generosity in Government programs plus recessions), the fact that the catered-to rich aren't giving much, and the fact that it is politically impossible to create the sort of structural reforms that will help eliminate poverty, you can see that the world is really quite screwed unless we take a bit more generous and humanistic approach to government.



04:15 PM



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Comments



why are you "all for taking charity out of the government's hands"? isn't one of the primary reasons of government to protect the interests of all its citizens? perhaps you are saying they have failed in this mission?



Posted by: clark at September 26, 2003 05:29 PM


Perhaps he means to say it would be nice if government handling charity were not necessary, which would be a nice point regardless. The real problem overlying humanity is that greed and self-interest are the primary driving forces that move us. Capitalism is the best system because it harnesses the natural human greed. Of course we do have a compassionate side too, but it takes a back seat to self interest nearly every time.

Doesn't surprise me that the richer people get the less they give. The more someone has the more they worry about losing it. They hedge against ever not having it. Because they are greedy they suspect everyone else is and guard their stuff, with gated communities, security systems, and even security guards, all in the safest parts of town. And it seems that this separates them from the rest of humanity to an extent that they can keep it all out of mind.

It's sad, really. I'm a pessimist when it comes to people but somehow still an optimist for the future.



Posted by: Norman at September 27, 2003 01:13 AM